Skip to content

Times Higher Education World University Rankings

The THE World University Rankings rank more than 2,000 research-intensive universities using 18 indicators on teaching, research, citations, industry links and international outlook. It is one of the three most cited global tables and is often used by governments and universities alongside QS and ARWU.

Reliability
Grade B · 8/12
Ranks
Universities
Editions
16 since 2010
Method
Mixed
How items get in
Free, institutions submit data
Status
Active
Times Higher Education World University Rankings
SectionEditions
Actions

Editions

EditionPublishedTop of the listOn record
2026October 2025University of Oxford20 of 2191
2025October 9, 2024University of Oxford16 of 2092
2024 Method changedSeptember 27, 2023University of Oxford12 of 1907
20232022University of Oxford10 of 1799
20222021University of Oxford9
20212020University of Oxford9
20202019University of Oxford8
20192018University of Oxford9
20182017University of Oxford8 of 1000
2016-20172016University of Oxford8 of 980
2015-2016 Method changed2015California Institute of Technology8 of 800
2014-20152014California Institute of Technology10 of 400
2013-20142013California Institute of Technology8 of 400
2012-20132012California Institute of Technology9 of 400
2011-20122011Not recordedAt the publisher
2010-2011 Method changedSeptember 16, 2010Not recordedAt the publisher

How the ranking works

Since the 2024 edition (WUR 3.0), THE scores universities on 18 performance indicators grouped into five areas: teaching (learning environment), research environment, research quality, industry, and international outlook. Inputs are institution-submitted data, THE's Academic Reputation Survey (68,402 responses for the 2024 edition) and Elsevier Scopus bibliometrics (134 million citations to 16.5 million publications for 2024). Institutions must meet publication thresholds and submit data to be ranked.

From 2010-11 to 2023 the method used 13 indicators in five areas; the launch weights were teaching 30%, research 30%, citations 32.5%, international mix 5% and industry income 2.5%. Bibliometric data moved from Thomson Reuters to Elsevier for the 2015-16 edition.

Ranked positions: Each item has a position (1, 2, 3), with ties allowed. Universities must submit institutional data to THE and meet publication thresholds to be ranked; there is no fee to be ranked. THE sells data, consulting, events and advertising to universities, and some institutions, such as Sorbonne University in 2025, have publicly criticized the method.

How far to trust it

Superscout grades every ranking on six criteria, each scored 0 to 2. Times Higher Education World University Rankings scores 8 of 12, grade B.

Transparency 1/2
Pillars and indicators published, but critics say results cannot be reproduced.
Independence 1/2
No fee to be ranked, but THE sells consulting and data services to universities.
Evidence 1/2
Mix of submitted data, reputation survey and Scopus bibliometrics.
Stability 1/2
Method breaks in 2015-16 (data source) and 2024 (WUR 3.0).
Coverage 2/2
2,191 universities ranked in WUR 2026.
Track record 2/2
16 editions under THE's own method since 2010-11.

History

Times Higher Education co-published the THE-QS World University Rankings from 2004 to 2009, then ended the partnership and launched its own ranking with Thomson Reuters data on September 16, 2010. In November 2014 THE brought data collection in house and switched to Elsevier's Scopus, and the 2015-16 table doubled to 800 universities.

After the 2016-17 edition THE began labeling editions with the following year (WUR 2018). The 2024 edition introduced WUR 3.0, the largest method change since 2010. Caltech led from at least 2012-13 to 2015-16; Oxford has ranked first in every edition since 2016-17, ten in a row through WUR 2026.

How it is received

THE is widely cited by governments and in university marketing, but critics question its heavy reliance on citations and a reputation survey. Commentators cited on Wikipedia argue that citation weighting disadvantages non-English-language universities and book-based fields in the humanities and social sciences, and higher education analyst Bahram Bekhradnia pointed to "very limited checking of data" after a submission error lowered Trinity College Dublin's position.

In October 2025 the president of Sorbonne University called THE's tables "black boxes" whose methods could not be reproduced or questioned, as reported on Wikipedia. THE's commercial services to ranked universities are also a common concern.

Strengths

  • Broad coverage of more than 2,000 universities in 115 countries.
  • Balances teaching, research, industry and international measures rather than research alone.
  • Pillar-level scores published for each ranked university.
  • Oxford's run since 2016-17 gives a consistent headline signal.

Weaknesses

  • Relies on university-submitted data with limited external checking.
  • Reputation survey and citations dominate the score.
  • WUR 3.0 (2024) and the 2015-16 data switch break comparability.
  • THE sells services to universities it ranks.
  • Critics, including Sorbonne University's president in 2025, say results cannot be reproduced.

Open questions

Facts not verified yet. They stay visible so they are not mistaken for settled facts.