Skip to content

Global Startup Ecosystem Index (countries)

The country ranking of StartupBlink's annual Global Startup Ecosystem Index, which aggregates the scores of each country's ranked cities and a national business-environment component across 120 countries. It is widely cited by governments to benchmark national startup policy.

Reliability
Grade B · 8/12
Publisher
StartupBlink
Ranks
Countries
Editions
9 since 2017
Method
Data
How items get in
Compiled by the publisher
Status
Active
Global Startup Ecosystem Index (countries)
SectionEditions
Actions

Editions

EditionPublishedTop of the listOn record
2026May 27, 2026United States10 of 120
20252025United States100
2024May 30, 2024United States6 of 119
20232023United States9 of 100
20222022United States6 of 100
20212021United States5 of 100
2020June 2020United States9 of 100
20192019United States5 of 100
20172017Not recordedAt the publisher

How the ranking works

Each ecosystem gets a total score that is the sum of three subscores: Quantity (number of startups, investors, coworking spaces, accelerators and startup meetups), Quality (accumulated private investment, startup employees, unicorns and exits above $1B, traction of startups measured through web data) and Business Environment (how supportive overall conditions are for startup growth; Makai notes that earlier editions drew on external indices such as the World Bank's Doing Business). Weights are not published.

Data come from StartupBlink's crowdsourced global startup map, supplemented by Crunchbase, Semrush, Statista and data from 100+ ecosystem partners, most of them government agencies. Scores are continuous and unbounded, so gaps between ecosystems are visible (San Francisco scored about 2.7 times New York in 2025).

Scores only: Indicator scores are published without a single overall rank. All ecosystems in StartupBlink's crowdsourced map and partner data are ranked; entities cannot apply. StartupBlink works with 100+ ecosystem partners, most of them government agencies, which supply data and appear in the report, and it sells a paid StartupBlink Pro data product. The full report is gated behind an email form.

Read the publisher’s methodology

How far to trust it

Superscout grades every ranking on six criteria, each scored 0 to 2. Global Startup Ecosystem Index (countries) scores 8 of 12, grade B.

Transparency 1/2
Subscore components are described but weights and algorithm are not published.
Independence 1/2
Ranks all mapped ecosystems, but partners with 100+ governments that supply data and are featured in the report.
Evidence 1/2
Mix of hard funding and unicorn data with crowdsourced map counts and web traffic.
Stability 1/2
Coverage and subscores have been expanded over time; no formal method breaks announced.
Coverage 2/2
Ranks 118 to 120 countries.
Track record 2/2
Seven or more annual editions since 2017.

History

StartupBlink, an Israeli startup-mapping company, published its first ecosystem ranking in 2017, followed by a 2019 report that expanded coverage to 1,000 cities and 100 countries. It has been updated annually since, branded the Global Startup Ecosystem Index by 2022. Coverage grew to 1,240 cities and 119 countries in 2024, 1,473 cities and 118 countries in 2025, and 1,556 cities and 120 countries in 2026.

StartupBlink reports year-on-year growth rates from total scores, which assumes comparable method across years.

How it is received

The index is widely quoted by governments and local media because it covers far more cities than any rival. Attila Makai (Hungarian Statistical Review, 2021) criticizes it: 'the algorithms used are not presented, nor are the weights assigned to each variable' so 'the results of the ranking cannot be verified', and he argues that importing external political and business-climate indices disadvantages some Asian ecosystems and that the ranking becomes less meaningful beyond about position 100.

Because much of the input is a crowdsourced map and web-traffic data, ranks for smaller cities can move sharply from year to year.

Strengths

  • Covers 1,500+ cities and 120 countries, far wider than other ecosystem rankings.
  • Publishes continuous total scores, so score gaps are visible.
  • Annual since 2019 with year-on-year growth figures.
  • Free public top lists and city pages.

Weaknesses

  • Subscore weights and algorithm are not published.
  • Relies partly on a crowdsourced map and web-traffic signals.
  • Full report is gated behind an email form.
  • Government partners that supply data are also marketed in the report.

Open questions

Facts not verified yet. They stay visible so they are not mistaken for settled facts.