Forbes Midas Seed List
A companion to the Midas List that ranks the top 25 investors at dedicated seed-stage firms worldwide by the outcomes of their earliest bets. It gives seed specialists, who rarely make the main Midas List, a data-driven league table of their own.
- Reliability
- Grade B · 9/12
- Publisher
- Forbes
- Ranks
- Investors, Seed-stage investors
- Editions
- 5 since 2022
- Method
- Data
- How items get in
- Free, institutions submit data
- Status
- Active
Editions
How the ranking works
Forbes and TrueBridge rank investors from dedicated seed firms only, excluding multistage firms and angels, with one individual per fund. A deal counts if the portfolio company went public or was acquired for at least $50 million, or has a private valuation above $100 million, and only if the valuation has at least tripled since the investor's first check.
Data comes from firm submissions and public sources. As with the main list, scores favor recent deals, earlier entry and higher multiples, and exact weights are not published.
Ranked positions: Each item has a position (1, 2, 3), with ties allowed. Built from the same free Midas submissions (eligible submissions are considered automatically) plus public data. No fees; TrueBridge, a venture fund-of-funds, is the data partner.
How far to trust it
Superscout grades every ranking on six criteria, each scored 0 to 2. Forbes Midas Seed List scores 9 of 12, grade B.
- Transparency 1/2
- Thresholds published, weights not.
- Independence 1/2
- Free submissions, but the data partner invests in venture funds.
- Evidence 2/2
- Deal outcomes and valuations.
- Stability 2/2
- Same criteria reported in 2022 and 2024.
- Coverage 1/2
- Top 25 from dedicated seed firms only.
- Track record 2/2
- Five editions.
History
Forbes launched the Midas Seed List in April 2022 alongside the main Midas List, with Anna Fang of ZhenFund at No. 1. Pejman Nozad of Pear VC led in 2023, 2024 and 2025, and Gili Raanan of Cyberstarts took the top spot in the fifth edition in May 2026. No method break has been announced.
How it is received
Seed firms publicize placements widely (for example boldstart ventures posts on its annual ranking), and the list is read as the seed-stage counterpart to the Midas List. No substantive published criticism specific to the Seed list was found in this research pass; the general Midas critiques (submission dependence, unrealized valuations, confidential weights) apply.
Strengths
- Focuses on seed specialists that the main list tends to miss.
- Clear published eligibility thresholds (3x markup, $50M exit or $100M valuation).
- Free to submit.
- Consistent method across its five editions.
Weaknesses
- Only 25 names, so coverage is thin.
- Excludes angels and multistage-firm seed investors by design.
- Relies partly on unrealized private valuations.
- Weights and underlying data are confidential.
Open questions
Facts not verified yet. They stay visible so they are not mistaken for settled facts.
- 2024 publication date comes from a firm blog (boldstart) rather than Forbes.
- Whether the 2026 thresholds changed from the 2022 to 2024 criteria was not confirmed; the 2026 methodology article returned HTTP 403.
Superscout describes Forbes Midas Seed List independently from the publisher’s own pages and outside coverage, linked below. The rankings belong to Forbes.
Sources and known limits
Last reviewed .
- Forbes 2026 Midas Seed List
- Forbes list data API, Midas Seed (per year)
- The Midas Seed List 2022 (boldstart ventures)
- The Midas Seed List 2024 (boldstart ventures)
- Midas Seed List 2023
- The 2025 Midas Seed List
- How China's Anna Fang Built The World's Best Seed-Stage Startup Portfolio
- Midas List 2026: Submissions Open