The rise of the “mini fund manager”

In the past, the path into venture capital was narrow. Most people landed partner seats by spending years as investment bankers or consultants, or by building and exiting a startup. Today, there’s another lane: start as a scout.

A scout is typically a founder, operator, or angel investor given capital—often $100K to $250K over a couple years—by a VC firm. With it, they place small bets, usually $10K to $50K per startup, on promising founders. If those companies grow into unicorns, the scout keeps a share of the profits (the “carry”).

It might sound like pocket change. But these small, high-leverage checks are rewriting who builds meaningful venture track records. Some scouts are now quietly sitting on portfolios that rival small institutional seed funds.

The math is stunningly asymmetric

Consider Jason Calacanis. As one of Sequoia Capital’s very first scouts, he wrote a $25,000 check into Uber in 2009. That tiny slice later ballooned to be worth tens of millions. In interviews, Calacanis has said his overall scout portfolio—about $700,000 spread across 19 startups—eventually became worth over $100 million on paper, largely thanks to Uber’s outlier success.

Or take Sam Altman. Before running OpenAI and Y Combinator, he was also a Sequoia scout. Altman wrote one of the earliest checks into Stripe, a position later valued at more than $25 million. That one scout investment arguably outperformed many full venture funds.

And it’s not just Sequoia. Matt MacInnis, who founded the ed-tech company Inkling, joined Sequoia’s scout program after his exit. With a string of small checks, he backed Notion and Clever early. Both grew into multi-billion outcomes. In his words, scouting offered “the most impactful way to stay close to early-stage builders.”

In each case, these scouts built venture-sized paper portfolios—while still working day jobs as founders or operators, without the burden of raising a fund from LPs or managing dozens of startups.

Why scout portfolios have become the ultimate résumé

Unlike traditional associate or principal roles at VC firms, scouts often have the final say on their bets. They run their own micro strategy. The downside? No salary and lots of zeros. But the upside is nearly uncapped. A scout who backs the next Stripe or Airbnb is instantly on the radar of every major fund.

This is why many general partners now say they value scout experience above conventional junior investing. It’s proof that someone can spot breakout founders early, build trust, and win allocation in competitive rounds. There’s no better demonstration of judgment than a multi-million unrealized return—especially when it came from writing checks without a partner committee signing off.

Increasingly, being a scout is like running a small solo VC practice, with all the autonomy and risk that entails. The difference is the capital is fronted by a big firm, and the infrastructure (legal, accounting, compliance) is handled for them.

Track records without managing LPs

Another reason scouts can build formidable portfolios: they aren’t stuck with typical fund constraints. They don’t need to show a uniform strategy or chase specific sector themes. They simply back founders they believe in. Many of these picks happen through personal networks: former coworkers, university friends, or other founders who approach them long before a company is on the radar of bigger funds.

This freedom also means scouts can often invest faster. Without multiple partner meetings, many scout deals get done in days. That speed is attractive to founders—especially when the money is non-controlling and comes bundled with a warm endorsement from a major VC brand.

In a sense, scout programs outsource early-stage discovery to people embedded in founder ecosystems. When it works, both the VC and the scout win big.

Why firms love these pipelines

From the VC side, scout programs are a cheap way to secure optionality. For a few million dollars spread across dozens of scouts, they create a global radar for seed activity. If even one out of fifty checks turns into a mega success, it pays for the entire program many times over.

For the scouts, it’s a no-brainer path to build investing credentials without needing to raise a fund. Many later spin out to raise their own vehicles or join firms as partners. The track record is undeniable: early checks in billion-dollar startups, even at tiny initial stakes, prove the kind of pattern recognition every LP and partnership wants to see.

The takeaway

The scout model has quietly flipped the ladder in venture. Instead of waiting for a fund to hire them, ambitious operators and founders can now build real venture-scale track records while still running their own companies or products. The best of them accumulate paper portfolios worth millions before they ever sit in a partner meeting—often making them more attractive to VC firms than associates who’ve never cut their own checks.

It’s why scouting has become one of the most popular wedges into venture. Small checks, huge upside, and the kind of skin in the game that teaches lessons faster than any boardroom ever could.

‍